Update!
Those wonderful, delightful, considerate, and fragrant smelling people at The Times have corrected their mistake. All is well with the world. This blog post is staying merely for #NaBloPoMo.
Rupert Murdoch and John Humphrys owe me £20! In protest, I’m going to quit listening to the Today programme until they pay up and apologise.
The Times has been running a literary competition:
Well, I like books, I like twitter, so I thought I’d enter with this little effort.
Pretty good, huh?
Ten minutes later, Nathan Smale re-posted (not retweeted) my story.
To his credit, my story was a full 140 characters and he quickly followed it up with
No big deal, right? The Times published my story as one of their “Best Entries So Far“.
They Got It Right The First Time
I was pretty happy and quietly confident that the £140 was mine.
Well,
my tweet won a runner-up prize! But The Times credited it to @nsmale – despite earlier crediting it to me!
Miscredited
Nathan Smale is, of course, blameless in all this. To his good credit he hasn’t tried to snaffle my prize and has alerted The Times to their egregious mistake.
I guess it goes to show that the new Retweet Functionality is much needed.
I’ve tweeted and called The Times and I’ll post any follow-up here.
Update!
Those wonderful, delightful, considerate, and fragrant smelling people at The Times have corrected their mistake. All is well with the world. This blog post is staying merely for #NaBloPoMo.
[qtweet 5771425322]Rupert Murdoch and John Humphrys owe me £20! In protest, I'm going to quit listening to the Today programme until they pay up and apologise.The Times has been running a literary competition:
[qtweet 3827335225]Well, I like books, I like twitter, so I thought I'd enter with this little effort.
[qtweet 4000800789]
Pretty good, huh?
Ten minutes later, Nathan Smale re-posted (not retweeted) my story.
[qtweet 4000890476]
To his credit, my story was a full 140 characters and he quickly followed it up with
[qtweet 4000893692]No big deal, right? The Times published my story as one of their "Best Entries So Far".
[caption id="attachment_1186" align="aligncenter" width="451" caption="They Got It Right The First Time"][/caption]
I was pretty happy and quietly confident that the £140 was mine.
Well, my tweet won a runner-up prize! But The Times credited it to @nsmale - despite earlier crediting it to me!
[caption id="attachment_1187" align="aligncenter" width="471" caption="Miscredited"][/caption]Nathan Smale is, of course, blameless in all this. To his good credit he hasn't tried to snaffle my prize and has alerted The Times to their egregious mistake.I guess it goes to show that the new Retweet Functionality is much needed.I've tweeted and called The Times and I'll post any follow-up here.
[...] I won a £20 Waterstones voucher in the Times’ Cheltnam Microfiction Competition – so the cost for me was £110. You can also sign up to Waterstones’ loyalty card – which will net you 389 points. That’s £3.89 off any subsequent purchase. At a shade over £100 it’s certainly the cheapest eReader I’ve found. It lacks some of the features of its high-priced cousins – no wireless, no touch screen, smaller screen. But, to my mind, that’s not a problem. [...]