<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Browser Statistics of 10 Downing Street</title> <atom:link href="http://shkspr.mobi/blog/index.php/2009/10/browser-statistics-of-10-downing-street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://shkspr.mobi/blog/index.php/2009/10/browser-statistics-of-10-downing-street/</link> <description>Mobiles, Shakespeare, Politics, Usability.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Wenn man schon twittert, dann doch bitte gleich richtig – Von Volker Davids - @Downingstreet, Unternehmen, Kommunikation, Frage, Tweet, Antwort - Sozial Medial</title><link>http://shkspr.mobi/blog/index.php/2009/10/browser-statistics-of-10-downing-street/#comment-3411</link> <dc:creator>Wenn man schon twittert, dann doch bitte gleich richtig – Von Volker Davids - @Downingstreet, Unternehmen, Kommunikation, Frage, Tweet, Antwort - Sozial Medial</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:05:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://shkspr.mobi/blog/?p=583#comment-3411</guid> <description>[...] kommt aber noch, dass @edent über die Zahlen geblogt hat (&#8221;Browser Statistics of 10 Downing Street&#8220;) und somit ist der positive Vermerk über die schnelle Rückmeldung von @Downingstreet nicht [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kommt aber noch, dass @edent über die Zahlen geblogt hat (&#8221;Browser Statistics of 10 Downing Street&#8220;) und somit ist der positive Vermerk über die schnelle Rückmeldung von @Downingstreet nicht [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wenn man schon twittert, dann kann man auch gleich richtig twittern &#124; Blog Kommunikation</title><link>http://shkspr.mobi/blog/index.php/2009/10/browser-statistics-of-10-downing-street/#comment-1729</link> <dc:creator>Wenn man schon twittert, dann kann man auch gleich richtig twittern &#124; Blog Kommunikation</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:52:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://shkspr.mobi/blog/?p=583#comment-1729</guid> <description>[...] kommt aber noch, dass @edent über die Zahlen geblogt hat (&#8221;Browser Statistics of 10 Downing Street&#8220;) und somit ist der positive Vermerk über die schnelle Rückmeldung von @Downingstreet nicht [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kommt aber noch, dass @edent über die Zahlen geblogt hat (&#8221;Browser Statistics of 10 Downing Street&#8220;) und somit ist der positive Vermerk über die schnelle Rückmeldung von @Downingstreet nicht [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Denny</title><link>http://shkspr.mobi/blog/index.php/2009/10/browser-statistics-of-10-downing-street/#comment-1706</link> <dc:creator>Denny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:04:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://shkspr.mobi/blog/?p=583#comment-1706</guid> <description>Facebook&#039;s stats would be the most useful, I think.  Very broad cross-section of the public on there now.I&#039;d be curious to see figures for The Sun, but I hope their readership isn&#039;t particularly representative of the public at large.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook&#8217;s stats would be the most useful, I think.  Very broad cross-section of the public on there now.</p><p>I&#8217;d be curious to see figures for The Sun, but I hope their readership isn&#8217;t particularly representative of the public at large.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Gerard</title><link>http://shkspr.mobi/blog/index.php/2009/10/browser-statistics-of-10-downing-street/#comment-1667</link> <dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:47:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://shkspr.mobi/blog/?p=583#comment-1667</guid> <description>Heh. I just used it professionally yesterday.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. I just used it professionally yesterday.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Terence Eden</title><link>http://shkspr.mobi/blog/index.php/2009/10/browser-statistics-of-10-downing-street/#comment-1666</link> <dc:creator>Terence Eden</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:03:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://shkspr.mobi/blog/?p=583#comment-1666</guid> <description>Just because someone is at work - doesn&#039;t mean they shouldn&#039;t count towards web-usage stats though, does it?  If you want your site to be accessible to large corporates - you still need to design for IE6.Or even if you want your site to be attractive to those who are browsing at lunchtime - you can&#039;t sneeze at a 12% market share.Of course, given your browser statistics, it may be that Conservatives are less conservative when it comes to upgrading their browser.  Perhaps a bigger and more neutral site - say BBC news or The Sun - would be a better benchmark?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because someone is at work &#8211; doesn&#8217;t mean they shouldn&#8217;t count towards web-usage stats though, does it?  If you want your site to be accessible to large corporates &#8211; you still need to design for IE6.</p><p>Or even if you want your site to be attractive to those who are browsing at lunchtime &#8211; you can&#8217;t sneeze at a 12% market share.</p><p>Of course, given your browser statistics, it may be that Conservatives are less conservative when it comes to upgrading their browser.  Perhaps a bigger and more neutral site &#8211; say BBC news or The Sun &#8211; would be a better benchmark?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tory Politico</title><link>http://shkspr.mobi/blog/index.php/2009/10/browser-statistics-of-10-downing-street/#comment-1664</link> <dc:creator>Tory Politico</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:51:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://shkspr.mobi/blog/?p=583#comment-1664</guid> <description>Tom you make a good point, if the figures were broken down so that it was more usable, I think it would be more telling. Lets face it if your accessing the Downing St website from within a corporate network, then chances are it will be on a PC using a flavour of IE. speaking from personal experience the majority of my blog readers use FF. So while interesting I don&#039;t think that these finding are very useful as they are.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom you make a good point, if the figures were broken down so that it was more usable, I think it would be more telling. Lets face it if your accessing the Downing St website from within a corporate network, then chances are it will be on a PC using a flavour of IE. speaking from personal experience the majority of my blog readers use FF. So while interesting I don&#8217;t think that these finding are very useful as they are.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom Watson MP</title><link>http://shkspr.mobi/blog/index.php/2009/10/browser-statistics-of-10-downing-street/#comment-1662</link> <dc:creator>Tom Watson MP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:17:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://shkspr.mobi/blog/?p=583#comment-1662</guid> <description>I would guess that the 12% for IE6 is only that high because civil servants are using IE6 at work. They could probably break the figures down to let you know what percentage of that figure comes from Whitehall itself.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess that the 12% for IE6 is only that high because civil servants are using IE6 at work. They could probably break the figures down to let you know what percentage of that figure comes from Whitehall itself.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin Anderson</title><link>http://shkspr.mobi/blog/index.php/2009/10/browser-statistics-of-10-downing-street/#comment-1659</link> <dc:creator>Kevin Anderson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:27:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://shkspr.mobi/blog/?p=583#comment-1659</guid> <description>Wow, I thought I was possibly the only person who had heard of Lynx much less still used it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I thought I was possibly the only person who had heard of Lynx much less still used it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: www.shkspr.mobi @ 2012-02-09 08:37:54 -->
